|
Top 100 Chemists, 2000-2010
|
|
|
Date:2011.02.28 | Author: |
Clicks:
| Print | Close
| Text Size: A
A A |
On February 10, 2011, Thomson Reuters released data identifying the world’s top 100 chemists over the past 10 years as ranked by the impact of their published research.
The top 100 is intended to celebrate the achievements of chemists who achieved the highest citation impact scores for chemistry papers (articles and reviews) published since January 2000. Thomson Reuters published the table in support of the International Year of Chemistry. Read the full report below the table.
Top 100 Chemists, 2000-2010, Ranked by Citation Impact Among those with 50 or more papers |
Rank |
Institution |
Papers |
Citations |
Impact |
1 |
Charles M. LIEBER Harvard University |
74 |
17,776 |
240.22 |
2 |
Omar M. YAGHI University of California Los Angeles |
90 |
19,870 |
220.78 |
3 |
Michael O’KEEFFE Arizona State University |
73 |
12,910 |
176.85 |
4 |
K. Barry SHARPLESS Scripps Research Institute |
60 |
9,754 |
162.57 |
5 |
A. Paul ALIVISATOS University of California Berkeley |
93 |
14,589 |
156.87 |
6 |
Richard E. SMALLEY† Formerly Rice University |
60 |
9,217 |
153.62 |
7 |
Hongjie DAI Stanford University |
88 |
12,768 |
145.09 |
8 |
Xiaogang PENG University of Arkansas |
59 |
8,548 |
144.88 |
9 |
Valery V. FOKIN Scripps Research Institute |
54 |
6,853 |
126.91 |
10 [MS 1] |
Peidong YANG University of California Berkeley |
95 |
11,167 |
117.55 |
11 |
Benjamin LIST Max Planck Institute for Coal Research |
81 |
8,808 |
108.74 |
12 [MS 50] |
Mark E. THOMPSON University of Southern California |
53 |
5,394 |
101.77 |
13 |
Robert H HAUGE Rice University |
55 |
5,566 |
101.20 |
14 |
Eric N. JACOBSEN Harvard University |
81 |
7,985 |
98.58 |
15 |
Banglin CHEN University of Texas San Antonio |
61 |
5,929 |
97.20 |
16 |
David W.C. MACMILLAN Princeton University |
55 |
5,267 |
95.76 |
17 |
Mostafa EL-SAYED Georgia Institute of Technology |
111 |
10,135 |
91.31 |
18 |
Ezio RIZZARDO Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization (CSIRO), Australia |
52 |
4,747 |
91.29 |
19 |
Michael S. STRANO Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
54 |
4,843 |
89.69 |
20 |
Michael J. ZAWOROTKO University of South Florida |
83 |
7,403 |
89.19 |
21 |
Dmitri V. TALAPIN University of Chicago |
56 |
4,981 |
88.95 |
22 |
Ryoji NOYORI Nagoya University |
62 |
5,486 |
88.48 |
23 |
Chad A. MIRKIN Northwestern University |
233 |
20,505 |
88.00 |
24 |
Liberato MANNA Italian Institute of Technology |
62 |
5,431 |
87.60 |
25 |
Richard P. VAN DUYNE Northwestern University |
88 |
7,690 |
87.39 |
26 |
Robert H. GRUBBS California Institute of Technology |
170 |
14,617 |
85.98 |
27 |
Carlos F. BARBAS Scripps Research Institute |
95 |
8,029 |
84.52 |
28 |
James R. HEATH California Institute of Technology |
69 |
5,830 |
84.49 |
29 |
Moungi G. BAWENDI Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
52 |
4,364 |
83.92 |
30 |
David A. CASE Rutgers University |
60 |
5,007 |
83.45 |
31 |
Shouheng SUN Brown University |
84 |
6,970 |
82.98 |
32 [MS 10] |
Catherine J. MURPHY University of Illinois Urbana-Campaign |
69 |
5,717 |
82.86 |
33 |
M. G. FINN Scripps Research Institute |
76 |
6,286 |
82.71 |
34 |
Stephen L. BUCHWALD Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
169 |
13,941 |
82.49 |
35 [MS 4] |
Younan XIA Washington University St. Louis |
161 |
13,120 |
81.49 |
36 |
Stuart L. SCHREIBER Harvard University |
66 |
5,369 |
81.35 |
37 [MS 19] |
Taeghwan HYEON Seoul National University |
82 |
6,587 |
80.33 |
38 |
George M. WHITESIDES Harvard University |
228 |
18,237 |
79.99 |
39 |
Ryong RYOO Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology |
77 |
6,057 |
78.66 |
40 |
Michael F. RUBNER Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
51 |
4,004 |
78.51 |
41 [MS 20] |
Xiangfeng DUAN University of California Los Angeles |
64 |
5,022 |
78.47 |
42 [MS 48] |
Michael GRÄTZEL Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne |
187 |
14,602 |
78.09 |
43 |
Gregory C. FU Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
111 |
8,384 |
75.53 |
44 [MS 89] |
Horst WELLER University of Hamburg |
73 |
5,428 |
74.36 |
45 |
Joan F. BRENNECKE University of Notre Dame |
65 |
4,827 |
74.26 |
46 |
Kenneth R. SEDDON Queen’s University Belfast |
94 |
6,916 |
73.57 |
47 [MS 8] |
Alan J. HEEGER University of California Santa Barbara |
66 |
4,758 |
72.09 |
48 |
Andreas MANZ Korea Institute of Science and Technology - Europe |
70 |
5,030 |
71.86 |
49 |
Hua Chun ZENG National University of Singapore |
53 |
3,673 |
69.30 |
50 |
Suprakas Sinha RAY Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa |
50 |
3,411 |
68.22 |
51 |
Mikhail E. ITKIS University of California Riverside |
60 |
4,069 |
67.82 |
52 |
Osamu TERASAKI Stockholm University |
92 |
6,198 |
67.37 |
53 [MS 29] |
Shaik M. ZAKEERUDDIN Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne |
63 |
4,204 |
66.73 |
54 |
Wenbin LIN University of North Carolina Chapel Hill |
104 |
6,930 |
66.63 |
55 [MS 2] |
Yadong YIN University of California Riverside |
57 |
3,787 |
66.44 |
56 |
John R. YATES Scripps Research Institute |
86 |
5,696 |
66.23 |
57 |
Samuel I. STUPP Northwestern University |
62 |
4,073 |
65.69 |
58 |
Prashant V. KAMAT University of Notre Dame |
99 |
6,426 |
64.91 |
59 |
John D. HOLBREY Queen’s University Belfast |
63 |
4,016 |
63.75 |
60 |
Jens K. NØRSKOV Technical University of Denmark |
122 |
7,736 |
63.41 |
61 [MS 5] |
Yugang SUN Argonne National Laboratory |
93 |
5,896 |
63.40 |
62 |
Evgeny KATZ Clarkson University |
97 |
6,147 |
63.37 |
63 [MS 75] |
Craig J. HAWKER University of California Santa Barbara |
141 |
8,893 |
63.07 |
64 |
Christian SRRE Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University |
72 |
4,517 |
62.74 |
65 [MS 71] |
Richard H FRIEND University of Cambridge |
74 |
4,642 |
62.73 |
66 |
Jean M. J. FRÉCHET University of California Berkeley |
209 |
12,985 |
62.13 |
67 |
James M. TOUR Rice University |
134 |
8,325 |
62.13 |
68 |
Robert C. HADDON University of California Riverside |
84 |
5,191 |
61.80 |
69 |
Peter J. STANG University of Utah |
103 |
6,356 |
61.71 |
70 [MS 24] |
Nicholas A. KOTOV University of Michigan |
78 |
4,809 |
61.65 |
71 |
F. Dean TOSTE University of California Berkeley |
84 |
5,163 |
61.46 |
72 |
Michal KRUK City University of New York |
54 |
3,315 |
61.39 |
73 |
Didier ASTRUC University Bordeaux I |
114 |
6,883 |
60.38 |
74 [MS 83] |
Michael GIERSIG Free University of Berlin |
55 |
3,310 |
60.18 |
75 |
George C. SCHATZ Northwestern University |
202 |
12,116 |
59.98 |
76 |
Harold G. CRAIGHEAD Cornell University |
51 |
3,042 |
59.65 |
77 |
Keith FAGNOU† University of Ottawa |
63 |
3,747 |
59.48 |
78 |
Milan MRKSICH University of Chicago |
54 |
3,168 |
58.67 |
79 |
Alois FÜRSTNER Max Planck Institute for Coal Research |
151 |
8,858 |
58.66 |
80 |
Karl Anker JØRGENSEN Aarhus University |
152 |
8,893 |
58.51 |
81 |
Rustem F. ISMAGILOV University of Chicago |
59 |
3,437 |
58.25 |
82 |
Richard A. FRIESNER Columbia University |
98 |
5,697 |
58.13 |
83 |
Jairton DUPONT Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul |
120 |
6,964 |
58.03 |
84 |
John F. HARTWIG University of Illinois Urbana-Campaign |
167 |
9,638 |
57.71 |
85 |
Robert LANGER Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
98 |
5,632 |
57.47 |
86 |
Mark E. DAVIS California Institute of Technology |
66 |
3,791 |
57.44 |
87 |
Manos MAVRIKAKIS University of Wisconsin Madison |
56 |
3,205 |
57.23 |
88 |
Adi EISENBERG McGill University |
65 |
3,720 |
57.23 |
89 |
Maurice BROOKHART University of North Carolina Chapel Hill |
87 |
4,978 |
57.22 |
90 |
Amir H. HOVEYDA Boston College |
122 |
6,967 |
57.11 |
91 |
Charles R. MARTIN University of Florida |
58 |
3,312 |
57.10 |
92 |
Alexander ZAPF University of Rostock |
60 |
3,407 |
56.78 |
93 |
Jeffrey R. LONG University of California Berkeley |
98 |
5,563 |
56.77 |
94 |
Neil R. CHAMPNESS University of Nottingham |
86 |
4,877 |
56.71 |
95 |
Naomi J. HALAS Rice University |
73 |
4,131 |
56.59 |
96 |
Abraham NITZAN Tel Aviv University |
51 |
2,879 |
56.45 |
97 |
Charles L. BROOKS University of Michigan |
67 |
3,778 |
56.39 |
98 |
Helmut CÖLFEN Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces |
82 |
4,595 |
56.04 |
99 |
Jérôme CORNIL University of Mons |
65 |
3,640 |
56.00 |
100 |
Geoffrey W. COATES Cornell University |
90 |
5,029 |
55.88 |
SOURCE:Essential Science IndicatorsSMfromThomson Reuters, January 1, 2000 – October 31, 2010 |
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) have proclaimed 2011 the International Year of Chemistry. During the year, celebrations and special events will be held around the globe “to increase the public appreciation of chemistry in meeting world needs, to encourage interest in chemistry among young people, and to generate enthusiasm for the creative future of chemistry.”
The table above is intended to celebrate the achievements of 100 chemists who achieved the highest citation impact scores for chemistry papers (articles and reviews) published since January 2000.
Citation impact (citations per paper) is a weighted measure of influence that seeks to reveal consistently superior performance. To ensure that a high score could not be achieved by a few highly cited papers, a threshold of 50 papers was used in the analysis. The average citation impact in chemistry for the period was 11.07, so all the researchers listed above achieved more than five times that mark.
Since approximately a million chemists were recorded in the journal publications indexed by Thomson Reuters during the last decade, these 100 represent the top hundredth of one percent. Sixteen of those listed also ranked in the top 100 by citation impact in materials science, among those who published 25 or more papers in that field during the last decade. Their ranks in materials science [MS] are noted beneath their ranks in chemistry.
Nanotechnology in all its aspects is strongly in evidence when one surveys the research interests of the chemists listed. While the rubric covers much, and some skeptics call “nano” the latest fad in chemistry, there is no denying the message of the citation indicators. The field has attracted enormous interest during the last decade. Of the 100, 60 of these chemists identify nanotechnology as their main focus or a significant research topic.
The national affiliations of the authors are: 70 for the United States, seven for Germany, four for the United Kingdom, two each for Canada, France, Denmark, Switzerland, and South Korea, and one apiece for Australia, Belgium, Sweden, Italy, Israel, South Africa, Brazil, Japan, and Singapore.
The institutions appearing three or more times are: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (6), The Scripps Research Institute (5), University of California Berkeley (5), Harvard University (4), Rice University (4), Northwestern University (4), California Institute of Technology (3), University of California Riverside (3), and University of Chicago (3).
To provide a more comprehensive view of high-impact researchers in chemistry, lists of the top 100 researchers in materials science and in biochemistry will appear during the year on ScienceWatch.com.
For more information, view Essential Science IndicatorsSM from Thomson Reuters. |
|